One abstract accepted and another submitted! Conferences 2012 underway

I was happy to receive a positive response to the abstract I submitted to The Fifth Israeli Conference of Qualitative Research to be held in February at the Ben Gurion University in the south of Israel. I attended the conference two years ago but did not dare to try to join the conversation – now it feels as though the time is right.

My abstract ( in Hebrew)

והרהרתי לעצמי: מי לומד יותר?

כמדריכה לחינוך לשוני, יזמתי השתלמויות מורים במשרד החינוך העוסקות בהוראת הכתיבה. בנוסף לעיסוק בפדגוגיה, בהשתלמויות אלו, המורים נפגשים עם הכתיבה ככלי ללמידה והעצמה מקצועית.  בארבע שנים האחרונות השתתפו כ-250 מורים מבתי ספר יסודיים בשש ערים במחוז צפון.

כמורת מורים העוסקת במחקר על למידתם המקצועית של מורים, אני מודעת לכך שלאורך תהליכי ההוראה וההערכה, אני בעצמי מתפתחת באופן תמידי. למידה זו מתרחשת בהקשרים חברתיים מגוונים: בדיאלוג עם המורים המשתתפים בהשתלמויות בהנחייתי, באמצעות השיח הכתוב בפורום המתוקשב שמלווה את ההשתלמויות ובחשיפה לפרקטיקה של המורים בכיתותיהם. למידה זו מתרחבת כאשר אני יוזמת דיאלוג עם חוקרים אחרים סביב טקסטים כתובים שאני מפיקה על עבודתי.

כמחנכת וכחוקרת העורכת מחקר פעולה נרטיבי על עבודתי עם המורים, הכתיבה עצמה היא ציר מרכזי בלמידתי ובעבודתי. עבורי, הכתיבה היא דרך עוצמתית לחקור את מעשיי. הכתיבה מאפשרת לי לעקוב אחרי שינויים במחשבתי ובעמדותיי ולהבין את המניעים לשינוי. דרך הכתיבה אני שואלת את עצמי שאלות ומגבשת כיווני פעולה. כתיבה רפלקטיבית ביומן מחקר ובבלוג, עוזרת לי לערוך רפלקציה משמעותית, לשקול חלופות ולהגיע למסקנות.

בהרצאתי אציג דוגמאות של טקסטים רפלקטיביים, המעידים על הלמידה שלי מתוך שיח ופעולה וקטעים מתוך ההתכתבות שלי עם מורים. בנוסף, אציג את הדרך שבה, לאורך שנים,  למידה זו מוצאת את אותותיה בעבודתי, במחקרי ובפרסומיי. אמחיש כיצד הידע שלי מקריאה מקצועית מעובד בכתיבה רפלקטיבית, מוצא את דרכו לעשייה החינוכית שלי ומעובד שוב בכתיבה מקצועית. לבסוף, אדון בתרומתו של בלוג מחקרי להתפתותי המקצועית.

בחקר הפדגוגיה שלנו כמורי מורים, עלינו לתאר את דרכי הוראה שלנו, להמליל את הידע שנוצר באינטראקציות מקצועיות שונות ולשתף עמיתים בידע שנבנה. הרצאה זו הינה צעד נוסף בשיתוף ובחיפוש דיאלוג מסוג זה.

The other abstract, which I submitted today is in English. If it is accepted (and I really hope it will be) I will post it here in March. The paper for that second conference is about blogging as an academic activity. I am interested in exploring the dialogic nature of blogging in general and academic blogging in particular

Change of Plans

On Wednesday, I got up under the impression that my first session in Z would go smoothly. I know the directions, I know how long it takes to drive there, I know the staff at the Pisga centre (apart from the new manager), I have done the same session three times in the past fortnight… I was sure everything would roll according to plan.

Maybe I should have suspected that the day wasn’t running to plan when I left school far later than I should have (“Just one more meeting”, “Just write this one paragraph for me…”, “Just remind someone…”). I arrived in Z on time but didn’t have the time to sit and have a quiet cup of coffee as I prefer to do before a session. It marks the division between school and course, the drive itself just isn’t enough.  Then the computer just wouldn’t open my windows 7 files. “Oh yes, that is the only room in the centre that we haven’t done the changeover yet…”  Luckily the technician was there but he only helped me with some of my materials.  

I thought I was ready to go when the participants began to arrive. Suddenly I realized that I recognized the teachers, they were in my group last year.  After hellos, I explained: “No, my course this year is for beginners, it’s the same as last year”.

“We want a continuation course”.

“So did I, but the centre staff decided there was more of a demand for first year so that is what they asked me to prepare”.

“We’ve come anyway, we want to learn more”.

“That’s great but… OK… let’s wait and we’ll see who arrives”.

“Even if it means doing the same things, we’re here”.

Thoughts were racing through my head. I knew we could deal with the same topics and others and that they could enrich their understandings but I certainly couldn’t show the same powerpoint presentation, do the same exercises or use the same examples. We waited until 4pm came and went and other teachers arrived. The group was small, too small, 11 in total – 6 “old” and 5 “new”.

I made a flash decision to run the session and to find a way to manage a course with such a diverse group.  I said “If I can do it in the classroom at school, I can do it here”.  How could I disappoint those six teachers, so eager to learn, so determined to continue the process we began last year? That said, I had to decide what to do in the three hour session before me. If I had been closer to home, I would have said “OK, go home, we’ll meet in two weeks time. In the meantime I will prepare new materials”. But I was an hour and a half drive from home and knew that nobody would pay for my transport if I didn’t run a session.

I have never before been in that position – a group sitting before me waiting to begin, a lesson plan ready, photocopies, books, powerpoint etc  waiting to share and then having to pull something else from up my sleeve.

After 3-4 minutes of thinking and composing myself, I began with my introductory letter. It worked for all – “new” and “old”, and gave me an extra 15 minutes to get ready while they were busy reading my letter and writing a response.

What did I do? I did a revision of the writing process on the board (I couldn’t get that powerpoint to open). From the questions asked by my continuing students, I could see it wasn’t a waste of time. Then I dwelt on the publication stage of the writing process and connected it to the characteristics of competent writers, another area we discussed last year. Finally I opened my pupils’ blog on my school web site and introduced them slowly to the wonderful world of student and teacher blogging. Last year I didn’t do this session with this group because so many of the teachers had extremely limited computer access. Under the circumstances, I decided the newness of the materials would suit the needs of both groups. The session went well.

At one stage, one of the teachers asked for an opportunity to introduce themselves to the group. This is the second time this has happened to me – I don’t know why I forget to do this when it is so important for me to get as much group interaction in as possible.  I promised we would do it before the end of the session.

I ended the section on blogging with an invitation that if anybody is interested in setting up a blog, I will be happy to help “I’ll even come to your home to assist you!” I promised. One teacher openly said she is going to give it a try. This is an enormous step for a very religious teacher working in an ultra – religious school.

To finish the session we did a round of introductions. I asked everyone to say their name, where and what they teach and areas of interest in the teaching of writing. It was fascinating. Three of the “new” teachers had come as a result of recommendations from colleagues at school. The other two are a mother and daughter teaching and studying together.

The continuing participants all talked about what they had done during the course last year and following it. They talked proudly of classroom success and empowerment. They talked enthusiastically about long term writing projects they had done with their students. One teacher described: “As a special education teacher, this was the first time my students have ever achieved a finished writing product they can be proud of.  They can thank you for that, Nikki”. “Oh no” I replied, “…they can definitely thank you for that!”.

Taking a few baby steps forward

When I see that my last post is from the end of August I feel that time is running away from me. We went back to school on the first of September and since then I have been on the run. I have been trying to get up at 4:00 am every morning in order to sit and work on my doctorate. I can’t say that it happens every day and there are days when I do get up but have some urgent assessment or planning to do for school and I do that. Most days I manage to take a few baby steps forward.  

I am working on three different things at once. My ethics application is being read by GP and I already know that there will be many changes made to it. I wanted to get the application in and authorized before starting this years’ courses but I understand now that that was unrealistic. Once I have the forms in, I need to send similar documents to the Israeli Department of Education, to get their approval too.

In the meanwhile, I have started working on the literature review, according to the recommendations in Destination Dissertation by Foss and Waters. I feel as though I am progressing and am enjoying the work so far.

In addition, I started teaching the first of my four professional learning groups yesterday. As part of my big effort to write a lot about my experiences with the groups, I returned to blogging this morning.

http://www.everystockphoto.com/photo.php?imageId=266493

http://www.everystockphoto.com/photo.php?imageId=266493

 

The clock is ticking all the time and I must write a new post, the one I got up to write, about my session yesterday.

Interesting materials on writing and publishing.

Often when I read Faultlines, Ward’s informative blog on writing a PhD, I encounter inspiring materials which help me as a writer and as a researcher. I have written here before that I began blogging after reading an article by Ward on her blogging experiences.

Today I read about Lilia’s honest post on publishing a PhD which is both exposing and highly personal.

Another wonderful source of information I discovered through Ward is the inspiring How I write series from Stanford – transcripts, videos etc.

Full Day Seminar for the N teachers

This week, school holidays for Passover,  I met with the teachers from N for a full day seminar. As we couldn’t meet at the teachers’ center, we met at my school. There are many benefits in this, including the use of our wonderfully equipped computer room and the friendly, educational environment (which we certainly don’t have this year at the center which is always “just about to be done up”). There is much to discuss about where external PL meetings take place and how the surroundings can contribute or hinder learning. An interesting comparison I should make is the experience I have this year at the two teachers’ centers, K and N.

Anyway, this time we met at my school, we began with hot coffee and cakes I brought with me. With 100% attendance (very rare, especially in school holidays) we began the seminar.

The day was divided into two parts – the first dealing with the digital text and the effect of the Internet on writing and the second on connections between reading and writing.

We began with a brilliant piece from You-tube, one I was introduced to by Ilana Snyder in the course I studied with her at Monash.

 

This piece has so much in it that I could have based a whole two hour workshop / lecture on it and still not touch all of the information and messages contained. The workshop was successful with very lively participation from all the participants (including those closer to the web and those that are barely computer literate).

My frustration with the Hebrew language surfaced again. Why aren’t there materials such as these being developed here daily? Why isn’t more material being translated?  When I bring something in English (even a cartoon), there is always tension in the air. Israeli teachers as a rule are threatened by the English language and would prefer not to use their knowledge in their learning, despite the fact that most have a fairly good grasp of the language.

Together we explored what our curriculum has to say about digital texts. I was surprised that most of the participants had not noticed these pages before. Then we moved on to a document that none of the participants knew existed, the standards booklet for  learning in an ICT environment. The necessary link between literacy teachers and the digital world out there is just not being formed. I got the impression that even the teachers who are technologically independent and do use computers and the Web in their teaching, have never dealt with the changes occurring in written language.

They were all interested and active and one of the senior teachers from my school commented that I must do the seminar (or at least part of it, with all the teachers at our school). I was satisfied that the questions were raised and that the topic is now “on the table”.

Two questions that need to be addressed, and of course were raised in the group are 1. the digital divide: “It’s not such a big deal at a school like this which teaches children from well off homes…” or “At our school there are no computers in the classroom and we don’t have lessons in the computer room…”   and 2. The expectation that teachers become more computer literate: “We have many teacher at our school that don’t know anything about computers, they are scared of them. How can they be expected to teach these things to the kids?”.

We then moved on to discuss the positive impact technology can have on student motivation to write. When I discussed blogs (explaining from the beginning as most had no idea what I was talking about) they were shocked by the possibilities. I could see that some of the teachers began racing in their minds what they can do with this new option, but others concentrated on the “why nots”: “My class is too big”‘, “I don’t have time to read all the writing and comment before it is posted”, “Who has time to check a blog every day and run it?”

I proudly presented the blog I am running for my students, I can’t wait to use blogging in other groups and classes next year.  

The second part of the day was dedicated to the connections between reading and writing. For a moment I was disappointed that I couldn’t show the powerpoint presentation I had prepared and then I realized that I didn’t need it. As a result the teachers talked more and I talked less – always a better situation.

As a starter they worked in pairs and prepared a venn diagram to present how reading and writing are similar and different. The discussion was very fruitful and the diagrams were very varied. I will scan them and post them on the virtual campus. We then opened up the discussion in the whole group. Later on I presented the research that has been done in the field and presented examples of work that can be done in the classroom, every day, to strengthen the connections between reading and writing. The aim is of course  to reinforce both writing and reading, and of course, thinking.

The most disturbing part of the discussion for me was when teachers who know how to combine the two spoke of how after “The Reading Wars”, they believed (or were specifically told) that everything they did in their Whole Language classrooms must be disregarded. As a result, they have been teaching reading very differently and writing has been totally separate. Some of the teachers in grades 1 & 2 commented that they thought that they weren’t allowed to ask the children to write until they “finished teaching reading” (Is that ever completed?). As the pendulum swings backwards and forwards, it seems that the more teachers are confused, and the less time is spent in real teacher learning, the results in the classroom are more destructive.  

 That’s it for today…

Research Presentations

During the recent school holidays I gave a two and a half hour presentation on my thesis to the literacy leaders of professional development, here in the north of the country. I was extremely nervous and hardly slept at all the night before. Some of my jitters were connected to the fact that this was really the first time I was presenting my own research to an audience and the rest were language related. It was a strange experience thinking and then talking my way thorough my material in Hebrew. The audience was extremely enthusiastic and I received many compliments, both on the day and by email afterwards. This was a group of 30 or so close colleagues and I felt that they were truly interested in what I have learned. The second part of the lecture dealt with blogging in general, edublogging and my own blogging experience. Many of the participants had never even seen a blog before.

 

This week we had a professional learning day at school. The grade six pupils taught the younger classes for four hours and the staff all met in the staff room. Apart from my lecture on blogging, two other teachers discussed their recent research. It was a fantastic day and again I had a wonderful response. Two of the teachers took the details for wordpresswhich is the most suitable site for Hebrew bloggers (as far as I can tell) and one of them has already signed up to open a blog herself.

 

I am constantly aware that I am very lucky to have the opportunities I do to share my learning and my conclusions with my peers. Maybe lucky isn’t the word I am looking for, maybe privileged?

Thesis is in! Flowers for my readers!

 http://www.fromyouflowers.com/images/products/new_large/TFWEB165.jpg

I can’t believe that my thesis has been handed in and that this enormous task is behind me.

It has been over a month since I blogged because I was just reading, writing and revising 20 or so hours a day. I was exhausted but more than that, I was riding an emotional roller-coaster. The closer I got to finishing, the more excited and nervous I became. On the one hand I was waiting to submit the piece and be done with it and on the other, I was upset that I was leaving this incredible learning experience behind. Tears of joy, achievement, pride, frustration and worry all joined, I found it hard to describe my feelings.

Now I have many questions to explore. After a year off school and my job as leader of professional development, I am going back to work full time. How will I manage to keep up my professional learning in formal and informal frameworks? Will I continue this blog which was essentially a study tool or will I begin a new work blog? I imagine that this will all become clear to me in the next few weeks.

This blog has taken on a role very different from that intended at the outset. I thought I was opening this site as a means of recording my study notes but it has become far more than that. Blogging has helped me develop my identity as a teacher and as a researcher, it has helped me think and reflect. My writing here has brought me into a community of edubloggers, wonderful people who, as I wrote in my thesis “have let me into their hearts and into their classrooms”.

I want to thank you for reading my work. I never imagined that anyone would find this blog and would take the time to read it. You have all made a great contribution to my study and to my thesis on professional learning for teachers. I appreciate you giving me your precious time, the flowers at the top are for you! 

 

 The next step is preparing my thesis for journal publication, another step in this wonderful endless journey of professional learning.

But… today I am on lifeguard duty at the pool… an exhausting experience of a totally different kind.

 

 Image from: http://www.fromyouflowers.com/images/products/new_large/TFWEB165.jpg

Blogging Thoughts

We are not positing that writing a weblog will change the articles we publish in scholarly journals. We do argue that blogging influences the way you think about thinking, and that it may change the process of research. To some extent it might even change the method”. (p. 254).

 “Both of us however experienced that writing the thesis became easier and the writing more focused after we started blogging” (p. 273).

Great!!!

Mortensen, T., & Walker, J. (2002). Blogging thoughts: Personal publication as an online research tool. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Researching ICTs in context. InterMedia Report, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, March, 2002. Retrieved from http://imweb.uio.no/konferanser/skikt-02/docs/Researching_ICTs_in_context.pdf

“Imaginary Landscapes”

This afternoon I was introduced to a new blog set up by a teacher for her students and colleagues and also to a new term “concept scrapbook”.

http://www.mycontextfile.blogspot.com/

In her blog, Mrs H. invites her pupils to explore the various images she has chosen to present on her site and to read the accompanying texts she has composed. She urges others to begin collecting “imaginary landscapes” which interest them. Mrs H’s opening paragraph is both explanatory and invitational:

“Here’s my ‘scrapbook’ of images and materials related to the VCE English Context of “Imaginative Landscapes”, along with some thoughts about the materials I’ve chosen to include … I hope this inspires you to start pulling together your own Context Scrapbook, either in hardcopy or online – Mrs H from Waverley Christian College, Victoria”.

I imagine this invitation was also extended in classroom activities and discussion.

My first reaction to the blog was simply to enjoy the incredibly clever visual and multimodal texts featured on the page. I was especially  fascinated by the sidewalk chalk creations as they were done by hand. I can’t believe anyone has the talent to compose such intricate 3D images on such a harsh “canvas” with the simplest of materials. Maybe this is one of the connections between landscape and imagination – the idea/dream/illusion far exceeds what can usually be created by man.

This blog is meant to be a showcase for work done by the teacher (as a model for her students) and as venue for generating discussion.  I will be following the development of the blog to see whether this written conversation does eventuate, I hope it does! 

Teachers writing for their students, with their students and in front of them has interested me since I wrote my diary/story about the 2nd Israel-Lebanon war as an assignment in Graham Parr’s course. At that time I read quite a few articles on whether teachers who write make better literacy / writing teachers – the answers to this question aren’t hard and fast.

For most of my teaching years I have felt very self conscious about my writing skills and until recently hadn’t dared to bring any of my texts to the classroom. I admire Mrs H and her initiative, what better way is there for a teacher to explain what a “context scrapbook” is and to set her pupils off exploring landscapes of their own?

In chapter 1 of “Learning how to teach writing”, Atwell (1998) writes about the importance of presenting her own writing in the classroom, she also relates to the difficulty in doing this.

“I have almost overcome my anxiety about revealing to the world how hard and slow writing is for me, and how wildly off-base my first attempts can be. I learned that I only have to write a little bit better than my students for them to learn from my demonstrations…I can only become their mentor, someone whose advice carries weight and truth, because I know writing from the inside, and I’ve shown them I do” (p. 26).

Atwell encourages teachers to write composition tasks they give to their students. From my own experience I know that this is the best way of really knowing what I am demanding of my pupils, discovering where different pupils are likely to experience difficulty and determining what kind of instructions and explicit instruction are neccessary. I am sure that Mrs H will be well prepared to support her students in their journey if she maintains her personal blog along the way.

I’ll try my hand too:

An imaginary landscape which accompanies me in my teaching and in my personal life while facing challenges (like now starting my thesis), appears in Dr Seuss’s brilliant book  Oh, the places you’ll go!

 

 There are so many inspiring quotes in this little book which can be particularly motivating for students daunted by a big project or challenge. Each page presents a different colourful imaginary landscape as the reader joins the main character who is simply (and cleverly) called “you” on the way to realizing personal aspirations. On You-Tube some of the landscapes have been animated.

 [kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/dK8TWFWLI20" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

  

Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading and learning.Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.